tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.comments2014-02-06T18:06:39.376-08:00Manwolf's Howls & GrowlsStephen D. Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comBlogger64125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-21453690557392048252014-02-06T18:06:39.376-08:002014-02-06T18:06:39.376-08:00check out my innersoundqigong.blogspot.com for the...check out my innersoundqigong.blogspot.com for the telekinesis videos by qigong masters - debunks the skeptics!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-27966260415717220142013-12-12T17:30:20.700-08:002013-12-12T17:30:20.700-08:00We (Bill and Bob Clark) do not agree with NG's...We (Bill and Bob Clark) do not agree with NG's "forensic video expert" Grant Fredericks' conclusion that the objects in our video are "probably birds".<br /><br />We have closely examined our 3 1/2 minute video frame by frame and there are several frames that show portions of a large unknown serpentine marine animal that are much larger than any known bird.<br /><br />After the airing of the program, we contacted NG and tried to get Mr. Fredericks to answer some questions about what can be seen in our video that prove it's impossible for the objects in our video to be birds but Fredericks refused to respond to our questions. <br /><br />To this day, Mr. Fredericks also refuses to provide written documentation explaining how and why he reached his conclusion so that other experts can examine it for its veracity.<br /><br />No professional video analyst would refuse to answer questions regarding their conclusion and refuse to provide written documentation explaing how and why they reached their conclusion.<br /><br />Therefore, we can only conclude that Mr. Fredericks is just a biased skeptic hired by NG who relied on "Occam's Razor" to debunk our and the other videos which were aired in their TV program.<br /><br />We also resent NG for portraying us as being so naive that we would mistake ordinary birds for a sea serpent.<br /><br />BTW, our first sighting of one of these animals swimming in SF Bay was on February 5, 1985 when one of the animals that was 60+ feet in length crashed into a submerged rocky ledge only 20 yards away from us while we were sitting in our car.<br /><br />If you want more details about our sightings and videos as well as other sightings of these animals swimming in SF Bay and along the California coast since 1873 then you are invited to visit our blog at http://home.access4less.net/~sfseaserpent/ <br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /><br /> sfseaserpenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16286918675751006396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-76364883747744501782013-04-04T21:33:13.778-07:002013-04-04T21:33:13.778-07:00I suggest checking with a member of the team. I b...I suggest checking with a member of the team. I believe they're all on twitter, and at least some are on Facebook. Ranae's twitter feed is:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/SkeptiScientistStephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-26997192662435495412013-04-04T18:44:18.790-07:002013-04-04T18:44:18.790-07:00Can anyone tell me the location of the church used...Can anyone tell me the location of the church used for the town meeting? My wife saw it and loves old churches so since we live in florida we could go see it and do some squatch hunting at the same time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-88291940023467722812013-01-01T21:11:37.208-08:002013-01-01T21:11:37.208-08:00I'm with you. (And I think Ranae might be, too...I'm with you. (And I think Ranae might be, too.)Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-11246342380697908682013-01-01T07:18:01.550-08:002013-01-01T07:18:01.550-08:00I looks very much like a raptor, either owl (wings...I looks very much like a raptor, either owl (wings tucked in) or possibly a hawk. The bird swoops down from an upper branch, and trips the motion sensor as it flies very close to the lens. It is disappointing that all the BFRO's explanations are from the frame of reference that it must be a seven foot tall creature standing on the ground, rather than exploring the simpler and naturalistic possibility of a much smaller bird in flight close to the camera lens.The Great Macawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01102298859347525582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-47049525253838851832012-12-19T01:24:20.790-08:002012-12-19T01:24:20.790-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15889860132054640939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-84897581425400733742012-11-20T07:32:54.093-08:002012-11-20T07:32:54.093-08:00I am a former investigator with the paranormal res...I am a former investigator with the paranormal research group who investigated the Enfield case. I will tell everyone right now, though it is still up for debate what exactly it was that was caught on our camera, I can assure you, the twin girl was asleep in the crib behind the homeowner that you can see in the video. The twins were sleeping in seperate cribs and there s only one baby in the crib in question at the time. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-32423395285511655032012-08-07T13:43:48.129-07:002012-08-07T13:43:48.129-07:00I just watch this episode and it was the first epi...I just watch this episode and it was the first episode i ever saw of this show i thought that the things they caught were 100% real i do believe that the dark man is real the fire going out and the horses running away really proved that they were not alone.abbynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-54781087874293779112012-07-11T08:50:08.916-07:002012-07-11T08:50:08.916-07:00I assumed the heat signature was from the sun beat...I assumed the heat signature was from the sun beating down on the relatively bare earth of the circle - but you're right, there should have been some follow up or explanation. Often, I feel these shows leave out explanations deliberately, to keep people feeling there's "something weird" going on.Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-14422555113696324982012-07-11T07:07:49.353-07:002012-07-11T07:07:49.353-07:00Doesn't anybody want to know...why.. is there ...Doesn't anybody want to know...why.. is there a heat signiture in the circle? what's under the ground? hellooooo... and a metal detector might be interesting or ground penetrating stuff <br />there is something under there. go back again and start digging.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-50263545524823341942012-07-03T08:33:19.019-07:002012-07-03T08:33:19.019-07:00BINGO. If you are videoing an object that is clea...BINGO. If you are videoing an object that is clearly an airship of some sort, would you stop filming at the height of the display? Everyone would ask, "What did it do next?"... What would the answer be? "Uhhh I dunno, I stopped filming it, 'cause I got such a killer image, I had to show everybody.." Stupid. That's why I think this show is contrived.Compassionate_Kudzuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18311814594640931904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-56512724126136013282011-05-23T12:23:06.866-07:002011-05-23T12:23:06.866-07:00I was really happy it was fact-based. It proved t...I was really happy it was fact-based. It proved to me (if proof were necessary) how silly all the other Area 51 shows have been. These folks were real Cold War heroes - no aliens required.Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-90760535913500726432011-05-23T12:18:52.842-07:002011-05-23T12:18:52.842-07:00Thanks, Autumn. My problem with many of these show...Thanks, Autumn. My problem with many of these shows is they go looking to prove something is true by finding things that "couldn't be faked." Really? _Can't_ be faked? See the Michigan Dogman case and numerous others throughout history, please. (Piltdown Man, anyone?) That's bad science.<br /><br />Good science is: What would it take to prove bigfoot is real? The answer is: a body.<br /><br />Failing that, good, solid evidence on a number of fronts coming from incontrovertible witnesses, preferably simultaneously. See the recent sighting of the red-crested tree rat -- for the first time in 113 years.<br /><br />Look! Good pictures! Reliable witnesses who know what they're talking about! (And have no skin in the game.)<br /><br />If someone were to photograph a bigfoot in HD, follow its trail, find fur and scat along the way, but not deliver a body, they might have a chance to be taken seriously. Until then....<br /><br />So, by all means, spend the money from these shows on a serious, long-term expedition.Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-23425355753603578842011-05-23T12:17:13.898-07:002011-05-23T12:17:13.898-07:00Yeah, I admit to hoping for some titillation with ...Yeah, I admit to hoping for some titillation with that one, but it was the truth. My ex got a job offer in 84 at a company that worked at Area 51. We considered the offer and decided to turn it down. Back then, it was a 1-1/2 hour drive by bus for employees to work and then 1-1/2 hours home every day! All that to work on boring military parts. I'm glad he turned it down because, I'm so curious by nature, I would have been bugging him every day he got home from work. Back then, no one knew it was called Area 51 or supposed to be linked to UFOs, but eventually, it got out and I would have been all ears.Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-22647980789597178512011-05-22T17:34:48.041-07:002011-05-22T17:34:48.041-07:00I watched that episode today (and all the other fu...I watched that episode today (and all the other fun shows on Natl Geo). I wasn't really impressed with it. There's no way we can prove or disprove the film, so I say--could we please have spent the entire show out in the woods looking for a blast BF? It's like video. If we get video of BF, either we get people who totally believe it because they saw it with their eyes or those who totally don't believe it because video can be hoaxed. The only way we'll ever answer this is find a furry-butted creature and haul him in. Besides, the shows where they camp out in the woods in the dark waiting and listening are more creepy and fun than sitting around using computers to generate scenarios. Great review!Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-18321645355397944872011-05-19T14:39:02.849-07:002011-05-19T14:39:02.849-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Casino? Gameshttp://bestcasino-odds.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-15128878802007499352011-04-30T21:56:57.784-07:002011-04-30T21:56:57.784-07:00Actually, I think they determine what to look at b...Actually, I think they determine what to look at based somewhat on number of hits on the videos -- and possibly how many folks seem deceived. "I want to believe," the X-Files said, and it never ceases to amaze me how many people will throw aside logic and good sense because they want to believe in aliens or monsters or whatever.<br /><br />So, I think that FoF is providing something of a service -- by bringing the reality of these cases to a wider audience on TV. Yes, some may seem silly to me (or you), but a lot of people still have the crazy idea that you can't say it on TV (or in print) if it's not true.<br /><br />I have no idea who they think is handing out Truth Licenses to TV and print media.<br /><br />Maybe FoF should do a show on that.Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-65244072520447159592011-04-30T08:35:31.917-07:002011-04-30T08:35:31.917-07:00I admit that I was happy they did the chuppie stor...I admit that I was happy they did the chuppie story and, in fact, it was the only worthy case they followed all season. I am not holding out a lot of hope that they can pick good cases next season. It seems like they're a bunch of kids in the slow learning class in school trying to figure out grown up puzzles. Unless they totally revamp their cast, I don't know how they can carry the show. I can't believe they even pursued the swing or the obviously hoaxed bad-looking alien. Oh my (sigh). Great synopsis of it! You'd enjoy the "LAUGH" series in the top buttons on my blog. I do ridicule FoF in quite a few issues of it. Should have you laughing pretty hard.Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-66578566727999524132011-04-13T08:58:03.925-07:002011-04-13T08:58:03.925-07:00Thanks for the comment. Next week is last of the &...Thanks for the comment. Next week is last of the "season?" The length of these SyFy "seasons" -- or lack thereof -- is starting to annoy me.Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-20434927954569938932011-04-12T22:32:30.257-07:002011-04-12T22:32:30.257-07:00Thanks for the review of the show's episode. T...Thanks for the review of the show's episode. The show has been going to so many outrageous places, that I find some episodes seem almost boring in comparison. Their problem now seems to be -- how to outdo themselves. I did get a chance to see the finale for next week in Antarctica and it was their best episode ever. I hope they can keep that creepy tone with next season's episodes.Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-33375691947902144082011-03-31T23:27:48.763-07:002011-03-31T23:27:48.763-07:00I'm not sure the character mix is wrong, I jus...I'm not sure the character mix is wrong, I just dislike it when they fall into pseudo-science. They need to be tougher, and if I never see another EVP session, it'll be too soon!Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-41738959500109263572011-03-31T21:12:40.784-07:002011-03-31T21:12:40.784-07:00Yeah, I'm not certain what I think of the show...Yeah, I'm not certain what I think of the show this season. I'm finding it has lost its zest quicker than "Ghost Hunters" did--that took 3 seasons to lose the bloom. I think there's too much cast, too boring a cast, and too much time in the field. I'd rather see videos the first half hour and then maybe test out one of the cases in the field with a cast of 3 people that we really enjoy seeing tackle it. I like the new guy, Devin, a whole lot. A breath of fresh air. They need some quirky, nerdish, or just grouchy characters. Nice review!Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-23591449910143121772011-03-22T21:54:03.542-07:002011-03-22T21:54:03.542-07:00Thanks for the kind words. Hope I'm not "...Thanks for the kind words. Hope I'm not "spoiling" you!Stephen D. Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03113498534825448148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3246512243384734102.post-2891391543878343562011-03-22T20:24:18.192-07:002011-03-22T20:24:18.192-07:00I feel like I'm cheating reading this because ...I feel like I'm cheating reading this because they haven't shown it yet here in AZ. I'm still excited to see it. I just like to see them in cool places. Great review. You really have a great writing style for this!Sharon Dayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13609356325356264202noreply@blogger.com